MODELING AS METHOD OF EDUCATIONAL REALITY ABSTRACTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.1.2018.140213

Keywords:

modeling, curriculum, curriculum models, components, struc-turing.

Abstract

The article presents modeling as a research method in current science, the advantages and possibilities of modeling techniques relating to curriculum develop-ment. The opportunity of models to reveal the structure and characteristics and behavior of real object is also carried out. The aim of the article is to analyze modelling and its opportunities in the research process; to characterize models, which go to make up curriculum planning; and the interrelation of curriculum models basic elements. Some approaches to curriculum development proposed by educators are described as well. The article covers the views of Ukrainian educators on the opportunities of modeling in the area of structuring; reflectionofobjectives.

It is noted that modeling is used in science in a number of use, in education in particular, as a method of defining new facts about the real object, which is studied. The paper provides an overview of the curriculum development process presented by some European scientists. It is defined that the purpose of curriculum modeling is to provide a structure for examining its key components, which go to make up curricu-lum planning and how these components work.

Special attention has been paid to curriculum models by R. Tyler, D. Wheeler, J. Kerr and E. Wragg who considered principle components of models of curriculum development (aims, subject matter, learning experience, evaluation) in their interact-tion. Wragg’s model is characterized as a new look to many-sided nature of curricu-lum. The three dimensions of the model are subject; cross-curricular themes and issues; and set of teaching and learning strategies and methods. It should best ressed that with the help of the model, the process of content structuring can be observed on the basis of three didactic principles of learning: continuity, sequence, knowledge integration.

Examples of curriculum models are used to illustrate the procedures in terms of curriculum structuring. It is revealed that the primary content modeling is considered as theoretical reflection of the process of selection, structuring, passing and evaluating of the level of its assimilation by pupils according to the objectives defined.

 

Author Biographies

Iryna Borysenko, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service

Ph.D. in Pedagogics, Head of Foreign Languages Chair

Tetiana Baliasnikova, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service

Senior lecturer of Foreign Languages Chair

Tetiana Ihnatovych, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service

Senior lecturer of Foreign Languages Chair

References

Curriculum development and models. [online] Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/.../curriculum-development-proce. [Accessed 20 February 2018].

Curriculum Theory, Design and Assessment (2000). Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning, p. 33.

Galton, M. (1998). Making Curriculum. Some Principles of Curriculum Building. The Primary Curri-culum: Learning from international perspectives; Edited by Janet Moyles and Linda Hargreaves. London: Routledge Falmer, pp. 73–81.

Gilbert, J. K. (2004).Models and Modelling: Routes to more Authentic Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Taiwan: National Science Council, (2), pp. 115–130.

Honcharenko, S. (2008). Pedagogichni doslidzhennja: Metodologichni porady molodym naukovcjam. Kyi'v – Vinnycja: DOV «Vinnycja», p. 119.

Humanjuk, T. (2010)Modeljuvannja v pedagogichnij. Naukovyj chasopys NPU im. M. P. Dragomanova, pp. 66–72. (Serija 13. – Problemy trudovoi' ta profesijnoi' pidgotovky).

Kliminskas, R. (2004). Realisation of Cubic Curriculum in European School Partnership Projects: Opportunities and Insufficiencies (the Case Study of the Project «Children’s Games»). Crete: Educationon-Line database, р. 5.

Kushner, Ju. (2001). Metodologyja y metodы pedagogycheskogo yssledovanyja uchebno-metodycheskoe posobye. Mogylev: MGU ym. A. A. Kuleshova, p. 90.

Marsh, C. (2004). Key Concepts of Understanding Curriculum – 3rd edition. New York: Taylor & Francis, p. 24.

Meshhaninov, O. (2005). Suchasni modeli rozvytku universytets'koi' osvity v Ukrai'ni: monografija Mykolai'v: Vyd-vo MDGU im. Petra Mogyly, p. 16.

Page, G. (1977). International Dictionary of Education. New York: Nichols Publishing Company, p. 268.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction To Curriculum Research And Development. London: Heinemann, p. 54.

The new Ukrainian school (2016).Conceptual principles of secondary education. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, p. 13.

Wragg, E. (1997). The Cubic Curriculum. London: Routledge, p. 40.

Zagvjazynskyj, V. (2004) Modelyrovanye v strukture socyal'no-pedagogycheskogo proektyrovanyja. Alma mater, (9) pp. 21–25.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-01

How to Cite

Borysenko, I., Baliasnikova, T., & Ihnatovych, T. (2018). MODELING AS METHOD OF EDUCATIONAL REALITY ABSTRACTION. Studies in Comparative Education, (1). https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.1.2018.140213

Issue

Section

OSVITNI REFORMY I INNOVATSIYI