THE INNOVATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING STRATEGY AS THE MODEL OF TEACHING PROBLEM SOLVING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.2.2018.153409Keywords:
Strategy, Education, Problem Solving, Teachers, Innovative Problem Solving Strategy, Teaching and Learning Concept.Abstract
The Innovative Problem Solving Strategy (IPSS) was developed as part of pre-service teacher training suggesting a new Teaching and Learning Curriculum (TLC). This research is aimed at analyzing the IPSS effectiveness if applied to solving problems concerned with plant anatomy, as well as at teaching students to use the problem solving strategy in innovative teaching (IT2), and the correlation of innovative ideas and TLC. This article is based on a case study on 94 students of Biology Department in Surabaya State University 2016/2017. The participants were divided into three groups. The data was collected through the assignment of developing a scientific project based on the indicators of innovative study, problem, work step, result, conclusion and developing TLC. The technique of data analysis took into account the indicator proportion, innovation testing and Pearson correlative testing. The results showed that (1) the average of each indicator achievement was≥ 0,7, (2) the result obtained for three groups was consistent, and (3) there was a positive correlation between the innovative ideas and Teaching and Learning concept. Thus, IPSS turned out to be efficient for the teacher to apply the innovative ideas and could be used as a role model for being introduced in the curriculum.
References
Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A Disciplinary Discourse Perspective on University Science Learning: Achieving Fluency In a Critical Constellation of Modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Volume 46 (1), pp.27-49.
Alberts, B. (2009). Making a Science of Education Science 323 (15). Available at: http://science.sciencemag.org. [Accessed 6 January 2015].
Alberts, B. (2009). Restoring Science to Science Education.Issues Sci. Tech 77–84. Available at: http://science.sciencemag.org. [Accessed 6 January 2015]
Alger, C., & Kopcha, T. J. (2009). E-Supervision: A technology framework for the 21st century field experience in teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education Volume 18 (2), pp.31-6.
Amri, S., & Ahmadi, K. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Kreatifdan Inovatif dalam kelas. Jakarta: PT. Prestasi Pusta karya.
Anwar, Y., Rustaan, Y.N., &Widodo, A.(2012). Kemampuan Subject Specific Pedagogi Calon Guru BiologiPeserta Program Pendidikan Profesional Guru (PPG) yang Berlatar Belakang Basic SainsPradan Post Workshop. Science Education Journal, Volume 1 (2), pp.157-162.
Aziz, M. S. A. (2014). E-supervision using blog: The graduate students’ reaction. Proceedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 118, 322 – 329.
Bao, L., et al. (2009). Learning and Scientific Reasoning Science, Volume 323 (5914), pp.586–587.
Boser, R. A. (1993). The Development of Problem Solving Capabilities in Pre-service Technology Teacher Education. Journal of Technology Education, Volume 4 (2), pp.11-12.
Brickman, P., et al. (2009). Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning on Student’s Science Literacy Skills and Confidence.International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Volume 3 (2). Available at: http://lrc.quangbinhuni.edu.
Burns, M., Pierson, E., & Reddy, S. (2014). Working together: How teachers teach and students learn in collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Instruction. Volume 7 (1), pp. 17-32.
Destalia, L. S.&Apriliya, S. (2014). Peningkatan hasil belajar dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah melalui penerapan pembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBM) dengan metode eksperimen pada materi pencemaran lingkungan. Pancara Journal, Volume 3(4), pp.213-224.
Dewitt, D., Siraj, S., & Alias, N. (2014). Collaborative learning: A module for learning secondary school science. Educational Technology & Society, Volume 17(1), pp. 89–101.
Dogan, I.,&Kunt, H. (2016).Determination of prospective preschool teachers' science process skills. Journal of European Education. Volume 6(1), pp. 32-42.
D'Zurilla, T.J. &Goldfried, M.R. (1991). Problem Solving and Behavior Modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Volume 78(1), pp. 107-126. Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org. [Accessed: 30 December 2012].
Funke,J., &Frensch, P.A. (2007).Complex Problem solving: The European Perspective-10 Years After, in D,H, Jonassen (ed), learning to solve complex scientific problem, New York: Lawrence Arlbarum.
Gilles,R. C.N., et al. (2011). Problem-solving consultation: Aplication in evidence-based prevention and intervention. In M.A. Bray & T.F. Kehle (Eds.) The oxford handbook of School Pshycology. NewYork: Oxford Press.
Green, L., & Ruggiero, D. (2007). Problem Solving through Digital Game Design: A Quantitative Content Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. Volume 73(1), pp. 28-37.
Hambach, J., Diezemann, C., & Tisch, M. (2016). Assessment of students’ learn competencies with the help of behavior video analysis-are good students better problem solver? Procedia CIRP. Volume 55(1), pp. 230–235.
Hansen, D. (2012). Appreciative Problem Solving. Binder paper Submissions Word Appreciative Inquiry Conference May 2012. Ghent-Belgium: Word Appreciative Inquiry Conference.
Henderson, M., et al. (2011). Positive Problem-Solving: How Appreciative Inquiry Works. Strategies and Solutions for Local Government Managers. Volume 43 (3).
Hoskinson, A.M., Caballero, M.D.,&Knight, J.K. (2013). How Can We Improve Problem Solving in Undergraduate Biology? Applying Lessons from 30 Years of Physics Education Research. CBE Life Sci Educ. Volume 12(2). pp. 153–161.
Indonesia President. (2012). Indonesia President Regulation No 8 of 2012 about framework of Indonesia national qualification. Jakarta: deputy of people’s welfare.
Indrawati., N. H. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Pada Pembelajaran Sub konsep Perubahan Lingkungan Terhadap Hasil Belajar Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Banjarmasin. JurnalWahana Bio.Volume 16(1). pp. 1-11.
Magdalena, O., Mulyani, S., &Susanty, E. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning Dan Inquiry Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Verbal Pada Materi Hukum Dar Kimia Kelas X Sman 1 Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Chemistry Education Journal. Volume 3(4). pp. 162-169.
Major, C, H.,& Palmer, B. (2001). Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based Learning in Higher Education:lesson from the literature. Academic Exchange Quarterly. Volume 5(10). pp. 4-9.
Mayer, R.E. (1992). Guiding Students Cognitive of Scientific Information Text. Journal of Education Psychology. Volume 884 (1). 405-412.
Meschede, N., et al. (2017). Teachers’ Professional vision, pedagogical content knowledge and beliefs: On its relation and differences between pre-service and in-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 21 (7). pp.1090-1100.
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
OECD. Education at a Glance 2012. OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en. 2012.
Pangestika, R., & Alfarisa,A. (2015). Teacher professional education: Strategy of Teacher Professional development and improvement of education quality of Indonesia. Paper at National colloquium at State University of Yogyakarta.
Paul, R. & Elder, L. (2007). The Thinker’s Guide: A Glossary of Critical Thinking Terms and Concepts, The Foundation for Critical Thinking. Available at: http://www.criticalthinking.org.
Risriasari, T., Priyono, B., &Sukaesih, S. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dengan Mind Mapping Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Unnes.J.Biol.Education. Volume 1(3), pp. 34-41.
Schmidt, H.G.,et al. (2011). The Process of Problem-Based Learning: What Works and Why. Medical Education. Volume 45(1). pp.792–806.
Sitti, S., Sopeerak, S., & Sompong, N. (2013). Development of Instructional Model Based on Connectivism Learning Theory to Enhance Problem-Solving Skill in ICT for Daily Life of Higher Education Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 103(1). pp.315–322.
Slavin, E. R. (2011). Educational psychology: Theory and Practice. Boston: Pearson.
Suh, K.J., & Park, S. (2017). Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach. Teaching and Teacher Education. Volume 6(4). Pp. 246-259.
Sweitzer, G.L., & Ronald, D.A. A. (1983). Meta-Analysis of Research on Science Teacher Education Practices Associated With Inquiry Strategy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Volume 20(5). pp.453-466.
Tarhan, L., &Acar-Sesen, B. (2013). Problem Based Learning in Acids and bases: Learning Achievements and Students’ Beliefs. Journal of Baltic Science Education. Volume 12 (5). pp.565-578.
Thabet, M., et al. (2017). The Effect of Problem-Base Learning on Nursing Students’ decision making skills and Styles. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. Volume 7 (6). pp.108-116.
Wang, Y., &Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research. Volume 11(1). pp. 81–92.
Wharton, R., &Parry, L. (2003). The good, the bad, and the ugly: using experiential learning in the classroom. The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Volume 3(3), pp.56-68.
Willis, P. (2015). Review from humble inquiry to humble intelligence: Confronting wicked problems and augmenting public relations. Public Relations Review.
Yew, E.H.J. & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Evidence for Constructive, Self-Regulatory, and Collaborative Processes in Problem-Based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Volume 14(2), pp. 251–273.
Živkovic, S. (2016). A model of critical thinking as an important attribute for success in the 21st century. Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, Volume 232(1), pp.102-108
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Rinie Pratiwi Puspitawati, Lenny Yuanita, Yuni Sri Rahayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the publisher, journal or its Editorial Staff.
The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors.
It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.
