LIFE VALUES OF AMERICAN STUDENTS: HISTORICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL ASPECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.3-4.2017.135854Keywords:
values, valuebenchmarks, terminal life values, instrumental life values, life values, functions of life values, American students, education, higher educational establishments, historical and pedagogical aspectsAbstract
The article presents the historical and pedagogical aspects of American students’ life values problem. The scientific views of American scientists on the problem of life values are analyzed. The most common is the understanding of life’s values as the foundation on which everyone builds their own life; as the principles of life, which determine how one should behave; as a beliefthat occupies a central posi-tion in the individual’s system of beliefs. In different historical periods, the most im-portant life values of American youth were the ability to intercultural communi-cation, freedom of choice, professional competitiveness, family well-being. American methods of studying terminal and instrumental life values of students in the process of obtaining their education in higher educational institutions have been described. The following main terminal values of American students at the beginning of the twenty-first century are highlighted: the existence of a family, self development, freedom of choice (statements and activities), pluralism and democracy in public relations, patriotism and active social position, professionalism and compete-tiveness, financialsecurity, health and fitness. Attention is drawn to the following functions ofAmerican students’ life values: 1) orientational towards ideals and pat-terns of activity; 2) constructive about life strategies; 3) normative about behavior styles. Curricula and programs of American higher education institutions are aimed at developing the students’life values in the following areas: spiritual, mental, eth-nopsychological, humanistic-communicative, social socialization, socio-political, professional competence and competitiveness, culture of health and safety.
References
Hall, E. T. (1983) Hidden Differences: Studies in International Communication. Grunder & Jahr, 24.
Jenkins, R. H. (2003) Franklin Delanj Roosevelt: The American Presidents Series: The 32nd President, 1933–1945. Times Books.November 4.
Kerr, Clark. (1991) The Great Transformation in Higher Education, 1960–1980. State University of New York Press.
Lechuga, V. M. (2008) Assessment, knowledge, and customer service: Contextualizing faculty work at for-profit colleges and universities. The Review of Higher Education, 31(3), 287–307.
Rogers, С. (1983) Freedom to Learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Rogers, C. (1972) Bringing Together Ideas and Feelings in Learning. Learning Today, 5, Spring, 32–43.
Rokeach, M. (1973) The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Schwartz, S. H. and Bilsky, W. (1990) Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–891.
Schwartz, S. H. and Boehnke, K. (2004) Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.
Seiden, M. (2009) For-Profit Colleges Deserve Some Respect. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55 (41), 80.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I. and Gross, B. L. (1991) Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159–170.
Trager, G. L. and Hall, E. T. (1954) «Culture as communication: A Model and an Analysis.» Explora-tions 3, 137–149.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Anatolіі Ocheretіanуі
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the publisher, journal or its Editorial Staff.
The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors.
It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.