Natalia Kholiavko, Tetiana Medina, Volodymyr Goshylyk


The article presents the experience of the Republic of Lithuania in moderni-zing higher education. The method of document analysis was used, in particular, data from the European statistics, national statistics departments, and the State statistics service of Ukraine. The application of the method of generalization and comparison made it possible to compare the transformations of higher education systems in Lithuania and Ukraine.

A number of problems typical for both countries that led to the introduction of a set of measures to improve the quality of educational services were found. They are the following: insufficient compliance with the requirements of employers, bureaucratization, mainly theoretical training, low competitiveness of graduates of higher education institutions in the labor market, slow introduction of modern information and communication technologies, outflow of young people to study in other countries of the European Union, and insufficient funding.

The correlation between the introduction of effective mechanisms for monito-ring higher education and the growth of the quality of educational services is demonstrated using the example of the Republic of Lithuania. It was found that the combination of two levels of monitoring – internal self–assessment and external expert quality assessment – gives the best result.

The article analyzes the dynamics of total expenses for training of one student in the context of funding sources, which indicates the predominance of state funding in the higher education sector in Lithuania. The criteria used to determine the amount of funding for Lithuanian higher education institutions are given, in particu-lar: the effectiveness of their research activities, the number of students, and the success of implementing the University's strategic development plans.

The directions of funding sources diversification for universities are defined, namely: promotion of cooperation between business entities and the scientific sphere in the areas of commercialization of research results and protection of intellectual property rights; attraction of funds from foreign sources; activation of cooperation between higher education institutions and business entities; creation of special centers for the commercialization of scientific research at universities. The key principles for implementing these measures are consistency, complexity, sequence and coherence of the elements of the four-link spiral Quadruple Helix (education – government – business – the public).


higher education; modernization of the Lithuanian higher education; quality of educational services; financing of higher education in Lithuania; diversification of financial sources in the higher education; commercialization of research results

Full Text:



Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology (2019). Promoting Commercialization and Trans-nationality of R&D Results EUREKA. Retrieved from:

Ballas, D., Dorling, D., & Hennig, B. (2017). Education. In The human atlas of Europe: A continent united in diversity (pp. 87-99). Bristol: Bristol University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t8937s.7.

Education and Training Monitor 2016. Country analysis. Lithuania. European Union. Retrieved December 3, 2019, from content/1/Edu_trainin_monitor2016-lt_en.pdf.

Deuten, J. (2009). The High Technology Development and the Industrial Biotechnology Development programmes of MITA. Peer Review report. European Union. Retrieved December 4, 2019, from

European Funding Guide (2014). Higher Education in Lithuania. Retrieved from

Ewert, S. (2012). Higher Education Cooperation and Networks in the Baltic Sea Region: A Basis for Regionalization and Region Building? Journal of Baltic Studies, 43(1), 95-116.

Friedhoff, C., Werner, D., & Roman, J. (2019). Gender Imbalance in Higher Education: A Comparison between Academic Positions, European Countries and Study Subjects. In Pritchard R., O’hara M., Milsom C., Williams J., & Matei L. (Eds.), The Three Cs of Higher Education: Competition, Collaboration and Complementarity (pp. 71-86). Budapest; New York: Central European University Press.


Godoń, R, Jucevičienė, P., & Kodelja, Z. (2004). Philosophy of Education in Post-Soviet Societies of Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania and Slovenia. Comparative Education, 40(4), 559-569.

Gray, A. (2016). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Retrieved from rial-revolution/.

Hoogenboom, A. (2015). Commodification of Higher Education: Students, Study Loan Systems and State Aid. European State Aid Law Quarterly, 14(4), 492-502.

Katus, K., Puur, A., Põldma, A., & Sakkeus, L. (2007). First union formation in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania: Patterns across countries and gender. Demographic Research, 17, 247-300.

Konohrai, V. V. (2015). Systemy otsinky yakosti vyshchoi osvity v krainakh Baltii: porivnialnyi analiz [Higher education quality assessment systems in the Baltic States: a comparative analysis]. Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies, 10, 345-355. Retrieved from UJRN/pednauk_2015_10_46.

Lithuanian higher education system needs drastic reform. (2016). Retrieved from culture/lithuanian-higher-education-system-needs-drastic-reforms-say-academics.d?id=71580 560.

Motova, G. (2004) Sistemy otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya v stranah SNG i Baltii [Systems for assessing the quality of education in the CIS and Baltic countries]. Higher school bulletin “Alma mater”, 1, 37-40.

Roffe, I. (1996). Transition and the Development of Higher Education Managers in Lithuania. European Journal of Education, 31(1), 109-124.

Rutkienė, A., & Ponomarenko, T. (2019). Initial Teacher Training Challenges in a Context of Educational Reform in Lithuania. In Kowalczuk-Walêdziak M., Korzeniecka-Bondar A., Danilewicz W., & Lauwers G. (Eds.), Rethinking Teacher Education for the 21st Century: Trends, Challenges and New Directions (pp. 140-149).

Opladen; Berlin; Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. doi:10.2307/j.ctvpb3xhh.13.

Saar, E., Täht, K., & Roosalu, T. (2014). Institutional barriers for adults' participation in higher education in thirteen European countries. Higher Education, 68(5), 691-710.

Šakalys, J. A. (1985) Higher education in Lithuania: A historical analysis. LITUANUS. Lithuanian Quarterly Journal of Arts and Sciences, 31(4). Retrieved from

Sbruieva, A. (2015). Rozvytok yevropeiskoi vyshchoi osvity v umovakh hlobalnoi finansovo-ekonomichnoi kryzy [The Development of European higher education in the global financial and economic crisis]. Ukrainian pedagogical journal, 4, 228-241. Retrieved December 13, 2019, from http://nbuv.

Science commercialization: challenges for innovations and new technologies to reach consumers. (2016). Retrieved from

Verbytska, A. V. (2017). Intehratsiia vyshchoi osvity Ukrainy v yevropeiskyi osvitno-naukovyi prostir: Monohrafiia [Integration of higher education of Ukraine into the European educational and research process: monograph]. Bragynecz O. V., Chernihiv.

Viliunas, G. (2007). Funding of higher education in Lithuania [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from

Weedon, E., & Riddell, S. (2012). Reducing or reinforcing inequality: Assessing the impact of European policy on widening access to higher education. In Weedon E., Riddell S., & Markowitsch J. (Eds.), Lifelong learning in Europe: Equity and efficiency in the balance (pp. 125-150). Bristol: Bristol University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt9qgnfk.12.

Copyright (c) 2020 Natalia Kholiavko, Tetiana Medina, Volodymyr Goshylyk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.