INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION IN MEXICO: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND (COLONIAL PERIOD AND INDEPENDENCE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.1.2023.288420Keywords:
Mexican intercultural education; education in the colonial era and during the period of Independence; innovative didactic practices designed by catholic missionaries; cultural assimilation and psychological acculturation in independent Mexico.Abstract
This article presents the results of a historical-pedagogical research, which objective was to determine the features of Mexican intercultural education in the colonial era and during the period of Independence. The authors conclude that in colonial times, Mexico has challenged the construction of a single national identity, imposing a European language and culture on a multicultural territory with Amerindian roots. From this, the harmony of Mexican society is sought (until today), the idea of involving minorities, which are groups of Mexican people who have been marginalized for having different ideologies with respect to the majority culture, persists. In the 16th century in the colony, the strategies used by the evangelizers for teaching Christian culture and Castilian to the conquered people were designed: education was traced as a conquest with the Franciscan missions. During the teaching of the Castilian language, which had the objective of evangelizing and obeying the monarchy, since it was considered the official language of the crown, some innovative didactic practices were designed. The time of the Independence of Mexico (1810) represented the dissidence of secular oppression. That is to say, the assimilation that implies the passive state of a culture in relation to another, the dominant culture, which considers it a superior culture, was implemented. After the Mexican Independence (1810) and revolutionary struggles (1910), pedagogy tried to strengthen culture and Spanish as the de facto language. In short, although it can be found certain connotation of intercultural education in pre-Hispanic multicultural society, nevertheless both periods analyzed, the colonial era and that of Independence, are characterized by processes of psychological acculturation, something very distant, even opposed to intercultural education. At the same time, certain of its features are observed in the process of indigenous languages´ studying by Catholic missionaries.
References
Acevedo, M. (1988). Panorama histórico de la educación y la cultura. SEP-DGCP.
Aguirre Beltrán, Gonzalo (1957). El proceso de aculturación. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Dirección General de Publicaciones.
Alarcón Meneses, L. (2010). “La educación en la época de la Independencia en América Latina (ca.1810-1850): Selección Bibliográfica”, Historia de la educación, 29, 333-352.
Carochi, H. (1759). Compendio del Arte de la Lengua Mexicana. Imprenta de la Biblioteca Mexicana.
Decreto constitucional para la libertad de la América mexicana, sancionado en Apatzingán a 22 de octubre de 1814 (1814).. Biblioteca Virtual Miguel De Cervantes. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmcp57c7
Durán, S. (1980). Ritos y fiestas de los antiguos mexicanos. Cosmos.
Eco, U. (1994). Trattato di semiotica generale. Bompiani.
Estermann, J. (2009). Colonialidad, descolonización e interculturalidad. Apuntes desde la Filosofía Intercultural. Instituto Internacional de Integración Andrés Bello.
Fábregas, A. (2011). Chiapas. Territorio, fronteras, migraciones, desarrollo: visiones interculturales multidisciplinarias. Universidad Intercultural de Chiapas.
García, S. (2004). De la educación indígena a la educación bilingüe intercultural. La comunidad purhepecha, Michoacán, México. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 9(20), 67-85.
Graves, T. (1967). Psychological acculturation in a tri–ethnic community, South–western Journal of Anthropology, 23, 337-350.
INAH (1877). Anales del Museo Nacional de México, No. 1, Tomo I. Mediateca INAH. https://mediateca.inah.gob.mx/repositorio/islandora/object/issue
Kobayashi, J. (1996). La educación como conquista. El Colegio de México.
León-Portilla, M. (1966). Filosofía náhuatl. UNAM.
López, A. (1961). La constitución real de México-Tenochtitlan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas.
Malinowski, B. (1940). Una teoría científica de la cultura. Editorial Sarpe.
Molina, fray Alonso de (1571). Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana. imp. A. de Spínola. bibliotecadigital.aecid.es/bibliodig/es/consulta/registro.cmd
Nolasco, M. (1988). La educación nacional ante la multietnicidad. In R. Stavenhagen, M. Nolasco (Eds.), Política cultural para un país multiétnico. SEP-DGCP.
Office of the European Union (2022). Tavole di percorso per il pronto soccorso e anamnesi italiano–inglese–ucraino. https://aulaabierta.arasaac.org/archivos/Items%20de%20portfolio/cuadernos-de-comunicacion-para-refugiados-de-ucrania.
Palomera, E. (1962). Fray Diego Valadés, O.F.M., evangelizador humanista de la Nueva España: su obra. Editorial Jus.
Picón, M. (1969). De la conquista a la independencia. F.C.E.
Pittman, R. (1947). Nahuatl honorifics. International Journal of American Linguistics, 14, 236-239.
Richard, A. (1995). Introduction to classical Nahuatl. University of Texas Press.
Sartori, G. (2001). La sociedad multiétnica. Pluralismo, multiculturalismo y extranjero. Santillana de Ediciones.
Stavenhagen, R., Baronnet, B. (2013). Educación e interculturalidad política y políticas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Tylor, B. (1871). Cultura primitiva. Editorial Ayuso.
UNESCO (1996). Compendio. Ediciones UNESCO.
Vázquez, J. (1981). Ensayos sobre la historia de la educación en México. El Colegio de México.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the publisher, journal or its Editorial Staff.
The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors.
It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.