Оцінювання якості шкільної освіти у Шотландії на прикладі діяльності інспекторату її величності
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31499/2306-5532.4.2013.44059Keywords:
якість шкільної освіти, оцінювання якості шкільної освіти, самооцінювання, середня освіта Шотландії, шкільний інспектор.Abstract
Статтю присвячено організації оцінювання якості шкільної освіти у Шотландії, її структурним та функціональним елементам. У статті детально розглянуто роботу Інспекторату її Величності в Шотландії, а також коротко схарактеризовано основні відмінності у роботі інспекторів шкіл Англії та Шотландії. Окрему увагу приділено процесу самооцінювання шкіл як ключовому елементу забезпечення якості шкільної освіти.
Статья посвящена организации оценивания качества школьного образования в Шотландии, ее структурным и функциональным элементам. В статье подробно рассмотрена работа Инспектората ее Величества в Шотландии, а также кратко охарактеризованы основные отличия в работе инспекторов школ Англии и Шотландии. Отдельное внимание уделено процессу самооценки школ как ключевому элементу обеспечения качества школьного образования.
The quality of education is positioned as a priority education policy of the European Union in the last decade. Significance of European cooperation in the development of high quality education is how to create a common platform for quality assurance in the Member-States and in the study and analysis of existing systems of evaluation of quality of school education to enrich the theory and practice in this area.
European orientation of Ukraine determines the need for the study, synthesis, critical thinking and creative application of the achievements of European countries in this area. Scotland’s experience in view of this is particularly important for Ukraine as a whole, and in particular British Scottish secondary education is positioned highly effective. The purpose of this article is to analyze the specifics of such a tool to ensure the quality of Scottish Education as Her Majesty’s Inspectorate.
Considering the problem of the quality of school education in Scotland, it should be noted the intensification of attention to this issue at all levels of Scottish society, due to socio- economic transformation. It is a fact that Scottish education decentralization in the context of intensified ideas of market economy provides greater autonomy to schools: schools are considered as one of the segments of «social benefits» as a company that is able to produce quality products without external assistance , educational institution are subjects in developing ways of education and impact on educational policy. Because schools receive more autonomy (which turns into a self- developing their curricula, selection of teaching materials, the possibility of innovation, independent distribution and use of budget funds, etc.) updated the institution responsible for compliance provided educational services established by government regulations , standards.
So as we can see, in Scotland in the context of a process of ongoing improvement of the quality of educational services is a permanent improvement of the relevant authorities, while the main focus while born on enhancing the role of schools and the community – parents, community – in the process. Great attention is given to schools’ self-assessment as a key element of quality assurance.
Summarizing the Scottish experience emphasize that this organization evaluating the quality of school education would be very effective on the national educational plane, which would allow to significantly improve the quality of education provided by our schools, increase accountability of schools for their work, expand the autonomy of schools to develop their own curriculum to ensure the credibility of students and their parents to the national education system.
References
Особливець Ю. О. Динаміка розвитку освітньої політики Великобританії в останній чверті ХХ – на початку ХХІ століття (перехід від ідей стандартизації до ідей персоналізації) / Ю. О. Особливець // Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія інноваційні технології. – 2009. – № 2. – С. 89–95.
Стратегія реформування освіти в Україні : рекомендації з освітньої політики. – К. : К.І.С., 2003. – 296 с.
Поташник М. М. Управление качеством образования / под ред. М. М. Поташника. – Педагогическое общество России, 2000. – 448 с.
Inspecting School. Handbook for Inspecting Secondary Schools with guidance on self-evaluation. – England : HMCI, January 2000.
International Organization for Standardization [Electronic resource]. – URL : http://www.iso.org/ iso/home.html.
Improving our School. A Consultation Paper on National Priorities for Schools Education in Scotland. Edinburgh, 2000.
Guidance for the Inspection of Local Authority Education Services for Children. Service Reporting Code of Practice for Local Authorities. Published CIPFA [Electronic resource] / THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND ACCOUNTANCY, 2010. – 485 p. – URL : http://www.tisonline. net/localauthorityaccounting/content/SeRCOP_2010_11.pdf.
How good is our School? Self-evaluation using quality indicators, HMIE, 2001.
How do Schools in Scotland Measure their own Progress? AERS, Applied Educational Research Scheme. – edited : University of Stirling, University of Strathclyde (education), University of Edinburgh. – Moray house, School of Education, St John’s Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh. – June 2008.
Maes B., Ver Eecke E. and Zaman M. Inspectorates of Education in Europe. A Descriptive Study. – SISI (The Standing International Conference of Central and General Inspectorates of Education). – DVO, 1998. – 431 p.
Education and Training 2020 (ET 2020) [Electronic resource]. – URL : http://europa.eu/ legislation_summaries/education_training_youth/general_framework/ef0016_en.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Аліна Джурило
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Responsibility for technical content and for protection of proprietary material rests solely with the author(s) and their organizations and is not the responsibility of the publisher, journal or its Editorial Staff.
The main author is responsible for ensuring that the article has been seen and approved by all the other authors.
It is the responsibility of the author to obtain all necessary copyright release permissions for the use of any copyrighted materials in the manuscript prior to the submission.